Citations (2)


Footnotes (92)



Method and Madness in Copyright Law

Dan L. Burk

University of California, Irvine School of Law

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-34

Black letter copyright law holds that methods and processes, as well as facts and ideas, are excluded from the subject matter of copyright. This doctrine extends back at least to the iconic Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Selden. But recent copyright cases have protected as copyrightable subject matter compilations of numerical values that are the products of calculation processes, such that protection of the final results seems tantamount to protection of the underlying process. These cases not only tread the line between fact and original expression, but underscore the difficulty of separating process from product in copyright. A careful examination of these decisions uncovers powerful but questionable philosophical assumptions embedded in copyright jurisprudence, and reveals hidden lacunae within the copyright statute that call into question the continuity and viability of current copyright doctrine.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: copyright, determinism, fact, expression, intellectual property, software, processes

JEL Classification: O31, O33, O34, L86, K30, K40

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 12, 2007 ; Last revised: October 6, 2015

Suggested Citation

Burk, Dan L., Method and Madness in Copyright Law. Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-34. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=999433 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.999433

Contact Information

Dan L. Burk (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )
4500 Berkeley Place
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
949-824-9325 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,956
Downloads: 313
Download Rank: 75,061
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  92