Citations (2)


Footnotes (19)



Reasoning with Rules

Joseph Raz

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law; Columbia University - Law School; King's College London – The Dickson Poon School of Law

Current Legal Problems, Vol. 54, pp. 1-18, 2001

What is special about legal reasoning? In what way is it distinctive? How does it differ from reasoning in medicine, or engineering, physics, or everyday life? The answers range from the very ambitious to the modest. The ambitious claim that there is a special and distinctive legal logic, or legal ways of reasoning, modes of reasoning which set the law apart from all other disciplines. Opposing them are the modest, who claim that there is nothing special to legal reasoning, that reason is the same in all domains. According to them, only the contents of the law differentiate it from other areas of inquiry, whereas its mode of reasoning is the one common to all domains of inquiry.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: Jurisprudence, Legal Reasoning, Rules

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 11, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Raz, Joseph, Reasoning with Rules. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=999552

Contact Information

Joseph Raz (Contact Author)
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )
St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom
HOME PAGE: http://josephnraz.googlepages.com/home
Columbia University - Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
HOME PAGE: http://josephnraz.googlepages.com/home

King's College London – The Dickson Poon School of Law ( email )
Somerset House East Wing
London, WC2R 2LS
United Kingdom

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 7,513
Downloads: 2,210
Download Rank: 4,367
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  19