Incentive Compensation When Executives Can Hedge the Market: Evidence of Relative Performance Evaluation in the Cross Section

Posted: 3 Jan 2004

See all articles by Gerald T. Garvey

Gerald T. Garvey

Blackrock

Todd T. Milbourn

Southern Methodist University (SMU) - SMU Cox School of Business

Abstract

Little evidence exists that firms index executive compensation to remove the influence of marketwide factors. We argue that executives can, in principle, replicate such indexation in their private portfolios. In support, we find that market risk has little effect on the use of stock-based pay for the average executive. But executives' ability to "undo" excessive market risk can be hindered by wealth constraints and inalienability of human capital. We replicate the standard result that there is little relative performance evaluation (RPE) for the average executive, but find strong evidence of RPE for younger executives and executives with less financial wealth.

Suggested Citation

Garvey, Gerald T. and Milbourn, Todd T., Incentive Compensation When Executives Can Hedge the Market: Evidence of Relative Performance Evaluation in the Cross Section. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=424753

Gerald T. Garvey (Contact Author)

Blackrock ( email )

400 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA NSW 94105
United States
4157930208 (Phone)

Todd T. Milbourn

Southern Methodist University (SMU) - SMU Cox School of Business ( email )

P.O. Box 750333
Dallas, TX 75275-0333
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,191
PlumX Metrics