Do Markets Respond to Quality Information? The Case of Fertility Clinics
32 Pages Posted: 21 Mar 2008 Last revised: 14 Dec 2022
Date Written: March 2008
Abstract
Although policymakers have increasingly turned to provider report cards as a tool to improve health care quality, existing studies provide mixed evidence that they influence consumer choices. We examine the effects of providing consumers with quality information in the context of fertility clinics providing Assisted Reproductive Therapies (ART). We report three main findings. First, clinics with higher birthrates had larger market shares after relative to before the adoption of report cards. Second, clinics with a disproportionate share of young, relatively easy-to-treat patients had lower market shares after adoption versus before. This suggests that consumers take into account information on patient mix when evaluating clinic outcomes. Third, report cards had larger effects on consumers and clinics from states with ART insurance coverage mandates. We conclude that quality report cards have potential to influence provider behavior in this setting.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Paying for Health Insurance: The Tradeoff between Competition and Adverse Selection
By David M. Cutler and Sarah Reber
-
By Sherry Glied
-
Learning and the Value of Information: Evidence from Health Plan Report Cards
By Michael Chernew, Gautam Gowrisankaran, ...
-
Learning and the Value of Information: The Case of Health Plan Report Cards
By Michael Chernew, Gautam Gowrisankaran, ...
-
Measuring Adverse Selection in Managed Health Care
By Richard G. Frank, Jacob Glazer, ...
-
Insurance or Self-Insurance?: Variation, Persistence, and Individual Health Accounts
By Matthew J. Eichner, Mark B. Mcclellan, ...

