Is Any Publicity Good Publicity? Media Coverage, Party Institutions, and Authoritarian Power-Sharing

Political Communication, 36(1): 64-82, 2018

55 Pages Posted: 8 Jul 2015 Last revised: 13 Jun 2019

See all articles by Fengming Lu

Fengming Lu

Duke University

Xiao Ma

School of Government, Peking University

Date Written: May 23, 2018

Abstract

Existing literature identifies non-official media as a tool for rulers to gather information from below. We argue that such media also help identify threats among elites. Motivated by profit, partially free media tend to cover politicians who challenge implicit norms of the regime. These political elites are perceived as threats to the power-sharing status quo, which leads peers to sanction them. We test this argument with evidence from the Chinese Communist Party’s intra-party elections of alternate Central Committee members in 2012 and 2007. With Bayesian rank likelihood models, we find that candidates who appeared more frequently in various partially free media received fewer votes from the Party Congress delegates, and this pattern is robust after accounting for a series of alternative explanations. Detailed case studies also show that low-ranked candidates have more partially free media coverage because they broke party norms.

Suggested Citation

Lu, Fengming and Ma, Xiao, Is Any Publicity Good Publicity? Media Coverage, Party Institutions, and Authoritarian Power-Sharing (May 23, 2018). Political Communication, 36(1): 64-82, 2018, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2627627 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2627627

Fengming Lu (Contact Author)

Duke University ( email )

208 Gross Hall
140 Science Dr
Durham, NC 27708
United States

Xiao Ma

School of Government, Peking University ( email )

No. 5 Yiheyuan Road
Haidian Qu
Beijing, 100871
China

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
207
Abstract Views
1,452
Rank
371,583
PlumX Metrics