Advertising Regulations in Pharmaceutical Markets: Product versus Enlightenment

42 Pages Posted: 27 Nov 2018 Last revised: 20 Jun 2019

See all articles by Junichiro Ishida

Junichiro Ishida

Osaka University - Institute of Social and Economic Research

Tsuyoshi Takahara

School of Economics, Senshu University

Date Written: January 17, 2019

Abstract

This paper analyzes the optimal content regulation of direct-to-consumer advertisement (DTCA) in a pharmaceutical market, with particular focus on the distinction between product and enlightenment advertisement. Firms are allowed to freely promote their own specific products under product DTCA, whereas they can only advertise the presence of a disease and its typical subjective symptoms under enlightenment DTCA. The content regulation changes the nature of market competition and the incentive to invest in advertisement, thereby yielding substantial welfare and policy implications. The overall welfare impact of the content regulation is ambiguous and depends, among other things, on the cost effectiveness of advertisement and the market-size distortion induced by product DTCA. We also analyze the effect of free market pricing and argue that a less stringent advertisement regulation, i.e., product DTCA, is often complementary to a less stringent price regulation.

Keywords: DTCA, Advertisement content regulation, Prescription decision

JEL Classification: M37, I11, I18

Suggested Citation

Ishida, Junichiro and Takahara, Tsuyoshi, Advertising Regulations in Pharmaceutical Markets: Product versus Enlightenment (January 17, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3265947 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3265947

Junichiro Ishida

Osaka University - Institute of Social and Economic Research ( email )

6-1 Mihogaoka
Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047
Japan

Tsuyoshi Takahara (Contact Author)

School of Economics, Senshu University ( email )

2-1-1
Higashi-Mita, Tama Ward
Kawasaki, Kanagawa 214-0014
Japan

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
129
Abstract Views
936
Rank
561,789
PlumX Metrics