Automatic Criminal Liability for Unlawful Confinement (Imprisonment) as a War Crime? A Potential Consequence of Denying Non-State Armed Groups the Power to Detain in Non-International Armed Conflicts

Ezequiel Heffes, Marcos Kotlik & Manuel J. Ventura (eds), International Humanitarian Law and Non-State Actors: Debates, Law and Practice (The Hague/Berlin, T.M.C. Asser Press/Springer, 2020), pp. 149-168

20 Pages Posted: 19 Jun 2019 Last revised: 4 Dec 2019

See all articles by Manuel J. Ventura

Manuel J. Ventura

Western Sydney University, School of Law; The Peace and Justice Initiative

Date Written: March 15, 2019

Abstract

The question of whether international humanitarian law (IHL) provides for the power of detention to Parties in a non-international armed conflict (NIAC) has been, of late, highly contentious. Whilst many have opined on this issue, most have reflected upon it purely from within the prism of IHL. This chapter takes a different approach. After identifying the interwoven nature of IHL and war crimes, it considers the issue from the perspective of international criminal law (ICL). It submits that if IHL does not provide for a power of detention in NIACs, then non-State armed groups (NSAGs) that engage in such conduct will most likely commit the war crime of unlawful confinement (imprisonment) as a violation of the laws and customs of war and simultaneously violate domestic criminal law. This has profound consequences. One of the incentives that NSAGs have to follow IHL is the possibility that, if they abide by its principles, they will not stand liable for war crimes. Further, IHL actively encourages the provision of amnesties to members of NSAGs at the end of the NIAC, but this can only extend to domestic crimes and not to war crimes. It is submitted that a situation whereby ICL liability is but a foregone conclusion for the mere act of detention – where no reprieve in the form of an amnesty is available – has a potentially negative effect on the incentive for NSAGs to abide by IHL standards when it comes to how detention is carried out. This should be kept in mind when considering the question of whether IHL provides for an authority to detain in NIACs.

Keywords: Non-state armed groups, non-international armed conflicts, power to detain, power of detention, international humanitarian law, international criminal law, unlawful confinement, imprisonment, strict criminal liability, war crimes

JEL Classification: K14, K33, K42

Suggested Citation

Ventura, Manuel J., Automatic Criminal Liability for Unlawful Confinement (Imprisonment) as a War Crime? A Potential Consequence of Denying Non-State Armed Groups the Power to Detain in Non-International Armed Conflicts (March 15, 2019). Ezequiel Heffes, Marcos Kotlik & Manuel J. Ventura (eds), International Humanitarian Law and Non-State Actors: Debates, Law and Practice (The Hague/Berlin, T.M.C. Asser Press/Springer, 2020), pp. 149-168, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3390649

Manuel J. Ventura (Contact Author)

Western Sydney University, School of Law ( email )

Locked Bag 1797
Penrith, NSW 2751
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://www.westernsydney.edu.au/staff_profiles/uws_profiles/mr_manuel_ventura

The Peace and Justice Initiative ( email )

The Hague
Netherlands

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
135
Abstract Views
822
Rank
540,687
PlumX Metrics