The Intersection of ISDS and TRIPS Flexibilities

Chapter in Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Investment Law, Christophe Geiger, ed. Edward Elgar Publishing, (Forthcoming)

21 Pages Posted: 20 Jun 2019

See all articles by Cynthia M. Ho

Cynthia M. Ho

Loyola University of Chicago School of Law

Date Written: June 14, 2019

Abstract

This chapter evaluates the extent to which TRIPS flexibilities are compromised by investor-state disputes regarding IP norms that are covered by TRIPS. The chapter begins with a brief discussion of IP norms under TRIPS, as well as TRIPS flexibilities and explains how ISDS poses a threat to TRIPS. Then the chapter analyzes the known investment disputes challenging IP norms to assess the significance of the ISDS threat to TRIPS flexibilities, including challenges by Philip Morris to tobacco labeling that restricts trademarks, Eli Lilly’s challenge to Canadian patent laws and several more recent disputes.

Keywords: TRIPS flexibilities, ISDS, investor-state dispute, Eli Lilly, promise doctrine, tobacco label, Philip Morris

JEL Classification: I1, I10, I18, I19, H51, K40, K41, K49, L52, L59, L88, L89, L69, L65, L12, L19

Suggested Citation

Ho, Cynthia M., The Intersection of ISDS and TRIPS Flexibilities (June 14, 2019). Chapter in Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Investment Law, Christophe Geiger, ed. Edward Elgar Publishing, (Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3404283

Cynthia M. Ho (Contact Author)

Loyola University of Chicago School of Law ( email )

25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
124
Abstract Views
799
Rank
584,619
PlumX Metrics