Assessing Human Information Processing in Lending Decisions: A Machine Learning Approach

Journal of Accounting Research, Volume 60, Issue 2, 2022

Posted: 11 Oct 2022

See all articles by Miao Liu

Miao Liu

Boston College - Carroll School of Management

Date Written: May 1, 2022

Abstract

Effective financial reporting requires efficient information processing. This paper studies factors that determine efficient information processing. I exploit a unique small business lending setting where I am able to observe the entire codified demographic and accounting information set that loan officers use to make decisions. I decompose the loan officers’ decisions into a part driven by codified hard information and a part driven by uncodified soft information. I show that a machine learning model substantially outperforms loan officers in processing hard information. Loan officers can only process a sparse set of useful hard information identified by the machine learning model and focus their attention on salient signals such as large jumps in cash flows. However, the loan officers use salient hard information as 'red flags' to highlight where to acquire more soft information. This result suggests that salient information is an attention allocation device: It guides humans to allocate their limited cognitive resources to acquire soft information, a task in which humans have an advantage over machines.

Keywords: human information processing, cognitive constraints, soft information acquisition, salience, attention allocation

JEL Classification: C55, D9, D83, G4, G21, M41

Suggested Citation

Liu, Miao, Assessing Human Information Processing in Lending Decisions: A Machine Learning Approach (May 1, 2022). Journal of Accounting Research, Volume 60, Issue 2, 2022, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4129380

Miao Liu (Contact Author)

Boston College - Carroll School of Management ( email )

140 Commonwealth Avenue
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
729
PlumX Metrics