Download This Paper
Preprints with The Lancet is a collaboration between The Lancet Group of journals and SSRN to facilitate the open sharing of preprints for early engagement, community comment, and collaboration. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early-stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision-making or presented without highlighting these facts. For more information, please see the FAQs.
Global Mentorship in Neurosurgery for Medical Students Study : A Multinational Cross-Sectional Audit
28 Pages Posted: 22 Nov 2022
More...Abstract
Background: To assess the perception of global mentorship in neurosurgery amongst medical students across the world. Secondary aim included investigating the factors affecting the availability and benefits of providing global mentorship scheme in neurosurgery at a medical student level.
Subjects: The Global Mentorship in Neurosurgery for Medical Students Study (GloMNMS) was a multinational cross-sectional audit that included medical students currently in the years 1 to year 6 and intercalating programmes. They were invited to complete an online survey between 11 March and 1 May 2022.
Methods: The survey was disseminated to 243 medical university ambassadors worldwide from 60 countries who distributed the survey within their respective medical student cohorts across the duration of the study.
Findings: Overall, 2962/3017 (98.2%) responses from medical students from 60 countries worldwide were included; 1439/2962 (48.6%) and 1523/2962 (51.4%) were from years 1-3 and 4-6 medical students including intercalating degree programmes respectively. 1712, 1502 and 1359 of responses gathered indicated that possible reasons for the lack of neurosurgical mentorship are lack of time and resources from trainees in Neurosurgery, time within medical school’s curriculum and awareness of societies in Neurosurgery/Neurology. 1276 and 1065 of medical students surveyed reported that it could also be due to lack of funding and overall inaccessibility within the area meaning there are few networking opportunities available.
Conclusion: This pilot study indicates that there is a scope for improvement regarding the availability and accessibility of neurosurgical mentorship programmes worldwide at a medical student level. The evaluation suggested that medical students would most benefit from the neurosurgical mentorship in the future by the means of increased numbers of mentors within their universities, accessibility to neurosurgical departments and the ability to choose mentorship globally via a unified digital platform.
Funding: This research did not receive grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, nor not-for-profit public sectors.
Declaration of Interest: All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval: We have also performed a UK NHS Health Research Authority guidance and having performed a check; it has been concluded by NHS Research Ethics Committees review that this study is exempted from ethical approval.
Keywords: neurosurgery, global neurosurgery, mentorship, education, undergraduate, medical student
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation