Offering EV Battery Swapping as a Service: EV Manufacturers or Battery Producers?

59 Pages Posted: 14 Apr 2024 Last revised: 25 Jan 2025

See all articles by Zhong-Zhong Jiang

Zhong-Zhong Jiang

Northeastern University - School of Business Administration, Department of Information Management and Decision Sciences

Kunyang Li

Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) - Antai College of Economics and Management

Christopher S. Tang

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Anderson School of Management

S. Alex Yang

London Business School

Date Written: April 7, 2024

Abstract

To overcome the range anxiety that hinders Electric Vehicle (EV) adoption, battery as a service (BaaS; i.e., drivers swapping depleted batteries with fully charged ones at battery-swapping stations) has emerged as a promising alternative to the traditional EV ownership model. This business model requires investment and operation of battery-swapping stations, prompting us to examine a question: Should EV manufacturers or battery producers build and operate these battery-swapping stations? By constructing a game-theoretical model with one battery supplier and one vehicle manufacturer, we compare two BaaS operating models: under the manufacturer-operated BaaS model (Model-M), the vehicle manufacturer procures EV batteries from the supplier and invests and operates the battery swapping stations; under the supplier-operated model (Model-S), the vehicle manufacturer sells battery-free EV to customers while the supplier invests and operates the battery swapping stations. We find Model-S may induce a higher number of battery swapping stations being built; however, Model-M can always entice more customers to adopt EVs. Further, Model-M leads to a higher profit for the manufacturer and and the overall supply chain. Interestingly, Model-M is preferable to the supplier when the cost of building battery swapping stations is low or the cost of producing batteries is low, resulting in a win-win situation. Further, by extending our model to include two competing EV manufacturers, we highlight that the choice between these two models hinges on the degree of downstream competition: in a low-competition environment, it could still be socially optimal for the leading EV manufacturer to lead the BaaS effort under Model-M; However, as competition intensifies, the battery producer is in general at a better position to offer the EV BaaS. By identifying how different operational and economic factors affect the relative merits between the two BaaS operating models, our paper provides insights for industry leaders and policymakers when deciding who should lead the effort of investing and operating the BaaS model.

Keywords: electric vehicle, battery swapping, supply chain, business models, servitization, competition, sustainability

Suggested Citation

Jiang, Zhong-Zhong and Li, Kunyang and Tang, Christopher S. and Yang, S. Alex, Offering EV Battery Swapping as a Service: EV Manufacturers or Battery Producers? (April 7, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4779240 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4779240

Zhong-Zhong Jiang

Northeastern University - School of Business Administration, Department of Information Management and Decision Sciences ( email )

Shenyang, Liaoning
China

Kunyang Li

Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) - Antai College of Economics and Management ( email )

No.1954 Huashan Road
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai, Shanghai 200030
China

HOME PAGE: http://https://sites.google.com/view/kunyangli/

Christopher S. Tang

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Anderson School of Management ( email )

110 Westwood Plaza
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1481
United States

S. Alex Yang (Contact Author)

London Business School ( email )

Sussex Place
Regent's Park
London, London NW1 4SA
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://salexyang.com

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
902
Abstract Views
3,801
Rank
66,442
PlumX Metrics