Pedagogies in the Meantime: Reflections on ADR and Restorative Justice in U.S. and Canadian Legal Education

14 Pages Posted: 2 Jun 2025

See all articles by Amy J. Cohen

Amy J. Cohen

Temple University, James E. Beasley School of Law

Daniel Del Gobbo

University of Windsor Faculty of Law

Date Written: May 12, 2025

Abstract

In a moment when restorative justice stands poised to mainstream in U.S. and Canadian legal education, this essay recalls some intellectual history of ADR as a comparative tale. We argue that ADR’s eventual embrace of a single state legal system greatly facilitated its uptake as a field in legal education. By contrast, our research suggests that restorative justice teachers are more capaciously asking how people’s efforts to imaginatively reconfigure conflict practices can open plural pathways to legal experimentation and social change. To that end, we observe what we are calling two “pedagogies in the meantime” that characterize this experimental work: comparison and prefiguration. We conclude by briefly reflecting on what these pedagogies could mean for restorative justice as a field in legal education.

Keywords: Legal pluralism;, Prefigurative legality, ADR, Restorative Justice, Circle Practice, Mainstreaming

Suggested Citation

Cohen, Amy J. and Del Gobbo, Daniel, Pedagogies in the Meantime: Reflections on ADR and Restorative Justice in U.S. and Canadian Legal Education (May 12, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5251541 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5251541

Amy J. Cohen (Contact Author)

Temple University, James E. Beasley School of Law ( email )

1719 N. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA
United States

Daniel Del Gobbo

University of Windsor Faculty of Law ( email )

401 Sunset Ave, Windsor
Windsor, ON N9B 3P4
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
109
Abstract Views
518
Rank
654,668
PlumX Metrics