Punish One, Teach A Hundred: The Sobering Effect of Peer Punishment on the Unpunished
Chicago Booth Research Paper No. 19-06
University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2019-12
66 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2019 Last revised: 26 Jul 2023
There are 3 versions of this paper
Punish One, Teach A Hundred: The Sobering Effect of Peer Punishment on the Unpunished
Punish One, Teach A Hundred: The Sobering Effect of Punishment on the Unpunished
Punish One, Teach a Hundred: The Sobering Effect of Punishment on the Unpunished
Date Written: July 25, 2023
Abstract
Direct experience of a peer’s punishment might have a sobering effect above and beyond deterrence (information about punishments). We test this mechanism in China studying the reactions to listed state-owned enterprises’ (SOEs) punishments for fraudulent loan guarantees by firms in the same location or industry (peers) and non-peer firms, across SOEs and non-SOEs. After experiencing SOEs’ punishments, peer SOEs cut their loan guarantees by more than non-peer SOEs and peer non-SOEs, even if information is common to all firms. The reaction is stronger for peer SOEs whose CEOs have higher career concerns or face lower costs of cutting guarantees. Managers’ overreaction to the salience of a peer’s punishment could be an important channel of transmission of the spillover effects of punishments on firms’ outcomes.
Keywords: Corporate Governance, Cultural Finance, Information Transmission, Peer Effects, Reputational Sanctions, Related Party Transactions, Emerging Markets, Corporate Fraud, Government Ownership.
JEL Classification: D91, D72, G32, G41, K42
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation