Do People Minimize Regret in Strategic Situations? A Level-k Comparison

51 Pages Posted: 5 May 2020

Date Written: April 1, 2020

Abstract

Regret minimization and level-k reasoning have been proposed as alternative models for rationalizing non-equilibrium behavior in games. We provide a theoretical and experimental analysis of the relationship between these two models, a relationship that has been neglected by economists. Both theories predict the same behavior in a surprisingly large number of experimentally tested games. We identify conditions under which this happens and use them to design a series of games to separate minimax regret from level-1. The experimental test of these games and data from Costa-Gomes and Crawford (2006) reveal that no one systematically minimizes regret, casting doubt on minimax regret as a relevant explanation for behavior in strategic situations.

Keywords: Regret Minimization, Level-K Model, Experiments, Initial Responses, Mixture-of-Types Models

JEL Classification: C72, C92

Suggested Citation

Garcia-Pola, Bernardo, Do People Minimize Regret in Strategic Situations? A Level-k Comparison (April 1, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3571868 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3571868

Bernardo Garcia-Pola (Contact Author)

University of the Basque Country ( email )

Barrio Sarriena s/n
Leioa, Bizkaia 48940
Spain

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
141
Abstract Views
640
Rank
521,245
PlumX Metrics