Who Teaches the Teachers? A RCT of Peer-to-Peer Observation and Feedback in 181 Schools

42 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2020

See all articles by Richard Murphy

Richard Murphy

University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics; London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Centre for Economic Performance (CEP); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); IZA Institute of Labor Economics; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Felix Weinhardt

Europa Universitat Viadrina (EUV); Berlin School of Economics; IZA Institute of Labor Economics; ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute); London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE)

Gill Wyness

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: 2020

Abstract

This paper evaluates a widely used, low stakes, teacher peer-to-peer observation and feedback program under Randomized Control Trial (RCT) conditions. Half of 181 volunteer primary schools in England were randomly selected to participate in a two-year program in which three fourth and fifth grade teachers observed each other. We find that two cohorts of students taught by treated teachers perform no better on externally graded national tests compared to business as usual. However this masks large heterogeneity; in small schools, which would have no choice over which teachers would be involved, we find negative impacts of the training (0.1-0.18SD), whereas we find positive impacts in larger schools (0.06-0.17SD). We conclude that the widely-used feedback program that we study is only productive in larger schools, and that centralised one-size-fits-fall teacher training interventions may be harmful.

Keywords: education, teachers, RCT, peer mentoring

JEL Classification: I210, I280, M530

Suggested Citation

Murphy, Richard and Weinhardt, Felix and Wyness, Gill, Who Teaches the Teachers? A RCT of Peer-to-Peer Observation and Feedback in 181 Schools (2020). CESifo Working Paper No. 8221, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3578255 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3578255

Richard Murphy (Contact Author)

University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics ( email )

Austin, TX 78712
United States

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Centre for Economic Performance (CEP) ( email )

Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

IZA Institute of Labor Economics ( email )

P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute) ( email )

Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, DE-81679
Germany

Felix Weinhardt

Europa Universitat Viadrina (EUV) ( email )

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
Frankfurt (oder), 15230
Germany

Berlin School of Economics ( email )

So Spandauer Str. 1
Berlin, 10178
Germany

IZA Institute of Labor Economics

P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin

Gormannstraße 22
10119 Berlin
Germany

CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, DE-81679
Germany

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) ( email )

Houghton Street
London, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

Gill Wyness

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) ( email )

Houghton Street
London, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
121
Abstract Views
782
Rank
415,884
PlumX Metrics