Interpreting Redistribution in the Spectator Game

20 Pages Posted: 19 May 2020

See all articles by Ingrid O. Telle

Ingrid O. Telle

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Sigve Tjøtta

University of Bergen - Department of Economics

Date Written: April 22, 2020

Abstract

Spectators act as a third party, and their decisions affect the payoff for other subjects but not for themselves; there is no trade-off between “one’s own” and “others’” payoff. This feature has caused spectator design to emerge as tool to measure spectators’ inequality preferences as redistribution among “others.” Here, we conducted a spectator experiment in which we fixed the redistribution choice set and varied the salience of the “no distribution” choice. We found a strong effect from this; in the more salience treatment, the inequality that the spectators implemented increased from medium, at 0.34, to very high, at 0.62. After the spectators made their redistribution choice, we asked them what motivated their choice. Analyzing the answers gave support that non-distributive norms matters in the spectator situations.

Keywords: Spectator game; measurement of inequality; salience; exit option

JEL Classification: D63,D90

Suggested Citation

Telle, Ingrid O. and Tjøtta, Sigve, Interpreting Redistribution in the Spectator Game (April 22, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3582427 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3582427

Ingrid O. Telle

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Sigve Tjøtta (Contact Author)

University of Bergen - Department of Economics ( email )

Fosswinckelsgt. 6
N-5007 Bergen, 5007
Norway

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
115
Abstract Views
716
Rank
617,542
PlumX Metrics