Monopoly Pricing, Optimal Randomization and Resale

73 Pages Posted: 21 May 2020 Last revised: 24 Feb 2021

See all articles by Simon Loertscher

Simon Loertscher

University of Melbourne - Department of Economics

Ellen Muir

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management

Date Written: April 9, 2020

Abstract

This paper provides a parsimonious and unified explanation for randomized selling mechanisms widely used in practice, yet commonly perceived as puzzling. We show that randomization implemented via opaque pricing and underpricing is optimal only if the revenue function with market clearing pricing is non-concave. Randomization involves conflation and rationing and, relative to market clearing pricing, leads to larger quantities sold. If this quantity effect is sufficiently strong, randomization increases consumer surplus. For fixed quantities resale increases consumer surplus. However, if resale is sufficiently efficient then consumer surplus can be larger under resale prohibition because resale reduces the equilibrium quantities.

Keywords: events industry, ticket pricing, secondary markets, rationing, underpricing, conflation, opaque pricing

JEL Classification: C72, D47, D82

Suggested Citation

Loertscher, Simon and Muir, Ellen, Monopoly Pricing, Optimal Randomization and Resale (April 9, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3585005 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3585005

Simon Loertscher

University of Melbourne - Department of Economics ( email )

Melbourne, 3010
Australia

Ellen Muir (Contact Author)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
285
Abstract Views
1,712
Rank
269,245
PlumX Metrics