Passion [,] Trumps Reason: Populism and the Logic of Port-Royal

Theorein: Revista de ciencias Sociales, no. 1, vol. IV, 2019. Quito, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador

23 Pages Posted: 27 May 2020

See all articles by William Brinkman-Clark

William Brinkman-Clark

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Date Written: January 30, 2019

Abstract

The vast majority of critiques to the populist discourse – especially those uttered in the context of political elections - tend to reduce it to an appeal to, or an instrumentalization of, affects and passions. Thus, populism is usually understood as the opposite of liberal enlightened discourse and, therefore, as an attack on the liberal democracies that were constructed thereupon. In this paper, it is my contention that, beyond the simple dichotomy between a discourse based on reason and another that confronts it by appealing to the irrational, populist discourse is the practical display, in the public realm, of another type of reason – in which the foundation of ultimate certainty lies not in consensus but in the individual – which has proven to be more efficient in the political terrain than its enlightened counterpart.

Keywords: Populism, Logic, Port-Royal, Reason, Liberal Discourse, Donald Trump, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, Jair Bolsonaro, Elections, Policy, Political Campaigns

Suggested Citation

Brinkman-Clark, William, Passion [,] Trumps Reason: Populism and the Logic of Port-Royal (January 30, 2019). Theorein: Revista de ciencias Sociales, no. 1, vol. IV, 2019. Quito, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3588510

William Brinkman-Clark (Contact Author)

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México ( email )

Alcanfores y San Juan Totoltepec s/n Santa Cruz Ac
Naucalpan, Estado de México 53150
Mexico

HOME PAGE: http://https://unam.academia.edu/BrinkmanClark

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
351
PlumX Metrics