Caesarism in Democratic Politics: Reflections on Max Weber
28 Pages Posted: 27 Nov 2007
Date Written: March 22, 2007
Abstract
Max Weber argued that every mass democracy tends in a caesarist direction. Weber employed the term to stress, inter alia, the plebiscitary character of elections, disdain for parliament, the non-toleration of autonomous powers within the government and a failure to attract or suffer independent political minds. A hundred years ago - even before present-day modes of campaigning, before present-day modes of political fundraising, before television advertising - Weber was of the view that the position of the President of the United States lies on the road to a pure form of caesarist acclamation. After analyzing Weber's views, the paper examines recent trends in American presidential politics.
Keywords: Caesarism, Max Weber
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Does Globalization Affect Growth?
By Axel Dreher
-
The Influence of Globalization on Taxes and Social Policy - an Empirical Analysis for OECD Countries
By Axel Dreher
-
Globalization, Ngos and Multi-Sectoral Relations
By L. David Brown, Sanjeev Khagram, ...
-
Has Globalisation Really Had No Effect on Unions?
By Noel Gaston and Axel Dreher
-
Does Globalization Restrict Budgetary Autonomy? A Multidimensional Approach
-
Explaining Welfare State Survival: The Role of Economic Freedom and Globalization
-
The Impact of Globalization on the Composition of Government Expenditures: Evidence from Panel Data
By Axel Dreher, Jan-egbert Sturm, ...
-
The Impact of Globalization on the Composition of Government Expenditures: Evidence from Panel Data
By Axel Dreher, Jan-egbert Sturm, ...