Redeveloping Derelict and Underused Historic City Areas: Evidence from a Survey of Real Estate Developers
38 Pages Posted: 11 Sep 2008
Date Written: July, 21 2008
Abstract
Infill redevelopment - the transformation of previously used urban sites - is generally regarded as an important way to attain environmental and urban sustainability goals. At many locales, however, such urban renewal, community development, and tax revenue goals must be reconciled with historic preservation objectives. Are economic incentives and regulatory relief useful tools for encouraging reuse of abandoned or underutilized urban sites with historic buildings? Answering this question is of key importance for many European cities and for older US cities, and has important implications in terms of urban sustainability and "smart growth" initiatives. We use conjoint choice experiments to explore the relative importance of economic incentives, regulatory relief, land use and property regime offerings at underutilized historical sites in Venice, Italy. We survey real estate developers and investors, and ask them to choose between pairs of hypothetical projects in three Venice locations, as well as between one of these projects and the alternative to do a development project elsewhere. Statistical models of the responses to these choice questions indicate that respondents are sensitive to the price of acquiring the land (and hence to any policies that influence prices), and especially sensitive to the property regime that would be granted to developers and investors and to the allowable land use. Contrary to expectations, our respondents were insensitive to tightening or relaxing the stringency of building conservation restrictions. Our findings sound a common theme with Howland (2004), who warns that redevelopment of previously used sites in Baltimore is impaired by obsolete land uses, zoning and infrastructure (but not by suspected or actual contamination). We conclude that the City should focus on offering land uses and property regimes that are more in tune with developer demand.
Keywords: Conjoint Choice Experiments, Real Estate Developers, Building Conservation Restrictions, Redevelopment Incentives, Brownfields, Infill Redevelopment
JEL Classification: Z1, R52
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Tax Policy and Urban Development: Evidence from the Indiana Enterprise Zone Program
-
Bidding for Industrial Plants: Does Winning a 'Million Dollar Plant' Increase Welfare?
By Michael Greenstone and Enrico Moretti
-
Do Local Economic Development Programs Work? Evidence from the Federal Empowerment Zone Program
By Matias Busso and Patrick Kline
-
Increasing the Economic Development Benefits of Higher Education in Michigan
-
Do Enterprise Zones Create Jobs? Evidence from California's Enterprise Zone Program
By David Neumark and Jed Kolko
-
Assessing the Incidence and Efficiency of a Prominent Place Based Policy
By Matias Busso, Jesse Gregory, ...