"Propertyzing" the Electromagnetic Spectrum: Why it's Important, and How to Begin

43 Pages Posted: 31 Oct 2008

See all articles by Lawrence J. White

Lawrence J. White

Stern School of Business, New York University; New York University (NYU) - Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics

Date Written: October 2000

Abstract

The Radio Act of 1927 began a long reign -- 73 years so far -- of all-encompassing federal regulation of the electromagnetic spectrum -- "the airwaves". The Act declared that the spectrum was the property of the entire American people and that it should be managed by the Federal Government "in the public interest". The reality of that regulation has been a process in which, all too often, the FederalCommunications Commission has discouraged competition, favored incumbents over entrants and innovators, delayed the development of new technologies, and generally mismanaged a scarce resource.There is a better way. That way would involve converting the use of the spectrum to asystem of property and property rights, which would function much like the system of property that applies to real estate. The rights, limitations, and boundaries of spectrum ownership could be specified. All spectrum could then be bought and sold, divided or aggregated, put to any legitimateuse, much like real estate, subject only to restrictions on interference (with other's use of their property) and to the application of general business laws, such as the antitrust laws. Property owners could use normal legal channels and procedures to protect their property against interference "trespass", just as is true for real estate.There would still be a role for the Federal Government in this system -- as the registrar of spectrum holdings (similar to land registries), as an owner of some of this property (parallel to the ownership by government of some real estate), and as the administrative agency that would dealwith those instances of widespread interference that are not adequately handled through private enforcement (much as the Environmental Protection Agency is designed to deal with widespread "pollution" problems that involve real estate); but the principle of property would be at the center, as is true for real estate.Though one could design a perfect "starting from scratch" property system, such a startingover proposal would be unrealistic. But a good start could be made by immediately establishing property rights with respect to current spectrum allocations and then encouraging property owners to rationalize their holdings.The FCC should continue its current program of auctioning spectrum and easing restrictions on auctioned spectrum and should move aggressively to establish property rights. But Congressional action is ultimately necessary for the "propertyzing" of the spectrum.

Suggested Citation

White, Lawrence J. and White, Lawrence J., "Propertyzing" the Electromagnetic Spectrum: Why it's Important, and How to Begin (October 2000). NYU Working Paper No. EC-00-08, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1292687

Lawrence J. White (Contact Author)

New York University (NYU) - Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics ( email )

44 West 4th Street
Suite 9-160
New York, NY NY 10012
United States

Stern School of Business, New York University ( email )

44 West 4th Street
New York, NY 10012
United States
212-998-0880 (Phone)
212-995-4218 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
143
Abstract Views
1,601
Rank
433,437
PlumX Metrics