33 Pages Posted: 26 Nov 2008
Date Written: September 25, 2008
In this paper, we shed light on the debate about the financial performance of socially responsible investment (SRI) mutual funds by separately analyzing the contributions of before-fee performance and fees to SRI funds' performance and by investigating the role played by fund management companies in the determination of those variables. We apply the matching estimator methodology to obtain our results and find that in the period 1997-2005, US SRI funds had better before- and after-fee performance than conventional funds with similar characteristics. The differences, however, are driven exclusively by SRI funds run by management companies specialized in SRI. While these funds significantly outperform similar conventional funds, funds run by companies not specialized in SRI underperform their matched conventional funds. We find no significant differences in fees between SRI and conventional funds except in one case: SRI funds are cheaper than conventional funds run by the same management company.
Keywords: Socially responsible investment, Mutual fund fees, Mutual fund performance, Mutual Fund Management Companies
JEL Classification: G20, G23, A13, M14, G12
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Gil-Bazo, Javier and Ruiz-Verdú, Pablo and A. P. Santos, Andre, The Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds: The Role of Fees And Management Companies (September 25, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1307043 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1307043
By Alex Edmans