Sovereign Wealth Funds: Active or Passive Investors?

Yale Law Journal Online, Vol. 118, p. 104, 2008

5 Pages Posted: 26 Nov 2008 Last revised: 8 Nov 2019

See all articles by Paul Rose

Paul Rose

Case Western Reserve University School of Law

Date Written: November 24, 2008

Abstract

Sovereign wealth funds (SWFs)-capital pools created by governments to invest surplus funds in private markets-are increasingly important global financial actors. Many fear that the economic power of SWFs, which is measured in trillions of dollars, will be used strategically and politically. Are fears that SWFs will be used as political tools justified? If political use of SWFs depends on their control of U.S. firms, the answer is almost certainly "no." There is no significant evidence that SWFs have or will use control of U.S. firms to implement governmental policy. Indeed, American political and regulatory constraints will pressure SWFs not only to avoid control, but also to avoid exercising significant influence over U.S. companies in their portfolios. Instead, the present cycle of SWF investment is likely to be characterized by passivity.

Keywords: sovereign wealth

JEL Classification: G34, G38, K20, K22

Suggested Citation

Rose, Paul, Sovereign Wealth Funds: Active or Passive Investors? (November 24, 2008). Yale Law Journal Online, Vol. 118, p. 104, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1307182

Paul Rose (Contact Author)

Case Western Reserve University School of Law ( email )

11075 East Boulevard
Cleveland, OH 44106-7148
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,001
Abstract Views
4,443
Rank
49,797
PlumX Metrics