Comparing Forecast Performance of Exchange Rate Models
23 Pages Posted: 21 Jan 2009
Date Written: June 2008
Abstract
Exchange-rate movement is regularly monitored by central banks for macroeconomic analysis and market surveillance purposes. Notwithstanding the pioneering study of Meese and Rogoff (1983), which shows the superiority of the random-walk model in out-of-sample exchange-rate forecast, there is some evidence that exchange-rate movement may be predictable at longer time horizons. This study compares the forecast performance of the Purchasing Power Parity model, Uncovered Interest Rate Party model, Sticky Price Monetary model, the model based on the Bayesian Model Averaging technique, and a combined forecast of all the above models with benchmarks given by the random-walk model and the historical average return. Empirical results suggest that the combined forecast outperforms the benchmarks and generally yields better results than relying on a single model.
Keywords: Bayesian Analysis, Model Evaluatin and Selection, Forecasting and Other Model Application
JEL Classification: C11, C52, C53
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Tests of Equal Forecast Accuracy and Encompassing for Nested Models
-
Long Swings in the Exchange Rate: are They in the Data and Do Markets Know it?
-
Exchange Rates and Fundamentals
By Charles M. Engel and Kenneth D. West
-
Exchange Rates and Fundamentals
By Charles M. Engel and Kenneth D. West
-
Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Nineties: Are Any Fit to Survive?
-
Exchange Rates and Monetary Fundamentals: What Do We Learn from Long-Horizon Regressions?
By Lutz Kilian
-
Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Nineties: Are Any Fit to Survive?
By Yin-wong Cheung, Menzie David Chinn, ...