Download This PaperCEO and Board Chair Roles: To Split or Not to Split
53 Pages Posted: 1 Jun 2009 Last revised: 29 Jan 2010
Date Written: December 16, 2009
Abstract
We document that firms that are larger, have stronger governance and more able CEOs are more likely to combine CEO and board chair roles (i.e., duality). We also document that firms that split these roles have significantly lower announcement and post-announcement returns, and lower contributions of investments to shareholder wealth. This result is more pronounced for firms that split due to investor pressure, and performance outcomes are more negative for firms with higher predicted values of duality based on our economic determinants model. Our evidence suggests that recent proposals for splitting the roles for all firms warrant more careful consideration.
Keywords: CEO duality; corporate governance; board chair; firm performance, investments
JEL Classification: G30, G38
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems
-
Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature
-
Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature
-
Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature
-
CEO Involvement in the Selection of New Board Members: An Empirical Analysis
By David Yermack and Anil Shivdasani
-
The Uncertain Relationship between Board Composition and Firm Performance
By Sanjai Bhagat and Bernard S. Black
-
The Non-Correlation between Board Independence and Long-Term Firm Performance
By Sanjai Bhagat and Bernard S. Black
-
The Non-Correlation between Board Independence And Long-Term Firm Performance
By Sanjai Bhagat and Bernard S. Black