48 Pages Posted: 8 Sep 2009
Date Written: August 2009
While many developing-country policymakers see heavy fertilizer subsidies as critical to raising agricultural productivity, most economists see them as distortionary, regressive, environmentally unsound, and argue that they result in politicized, inefficient distribution of fertilizer supply. We model farmers as facing small fixed costs of purchasing fertilizer, and assume some are stochastically present-biased and not fully sophisticated about this bias. Even when relatively patient, such farmers may procrastinate, postponing fertilizer purchases until later periods, when they may be too impatient to purchase fertilizer. Consistent with the model, many farmers in Western Kenya fail to take advantage of apparently profitable fertilizer investments, but they do invest in response to small, time-limited discounts on the cost of acquiring fertilizer (free delivery) just after harvest. Later discounts have a smaller impact, and when given a choice of price schedules, many farmers choose schedules that induce advance purchase. Calibration suggests such small, time-limited discounts yield higher welfare than either laissez faire or heavy subsidies by helping present-biased farmers commit to fertilizer use without inducing those with standard preferences to substantially overuse fertilizer.
Keywords: hyperbolic discounting, technology adoption
JEL Classification: D03, O12, O38
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Duflo, Esther and Kremer, Michael and Robinson, Jonathan, Nudging Farmers to Utilize Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Kenya (August 2009). CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP7402. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1469881
By Tavneet Suri
By Tavneet Suri
This is a CEPR Discussion Paper. CEPR charges a fee of $5.00 for this paper.Login using your CEPR Personal Profile
File name: DP7402.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.