Standards and the Distribution of Cognitive Labour
Logic Journal of IGPL, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 278-293, 2010
16 Pages Posted: 26 Dec 2009 Last revised: 9 Aug 2010
Date Written: December 16, 2009
We present a model of the distribution of labour in science. Such models tend to rely on the mechanism of the invisible hand (e.g. Hull 1988, Goldman & Shaked 1991 and Kitcher 1990). Our analysis starts from the necessity of standards in distributed processes and the possibility of multiple standards in science. Invisible hand models turn out to have only limited scope because they are restricted to describing the atypical single-standard case. Our model is a generalisation of these models to J standards; single-standard models such as Kitcher (1990) are a limiting case. We introduce and formalise this model, demonstrate its dynamics and conclude that the conclusions commonly derived from invisible hand models about the distribution of labour in science are not robust against changes in the number of standards.
Keywords: Distribution of cognitive labor, division of labor, dynamics of scientfic activity, CO-IR discrepancy, invisible hand, standards, increasing returns to adoption, Philip Kitcher, network industry
JEL Classification: A13, A14, D71
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
U.S. Public Policy Toward Network Industries
"Propertyzing" the Electromagnetic Spectrum: Why it's Important, and How to Begin
The Deregulation of the Telephone Industry: The Lessons from the U.S. Railroad Deregulation Experience
The Telecom Revolution: An American Opportunity
By George Keyworth, Jeffrey A. Eisenach, ...
Microsoft and Browsers: Are the Antitrust Problems Really New?
Promoting Competition in the Natural Gas Industry
Local Monopoly, Network Effects and Technical Efficiency – Evidence from Taiwan’s Natural Gas Industry
By Ting-kun Liu