The Contribution of Intergenerational Transfers to Total Wealth: a Reply
27 Pages Posted: 6 Jul 2004 Last revised: 31 Dec 2022
Date Written: February 1986
Abstract
This paper responds to Franco Modigliani's recent critique of our 1981 paper on the importance of intergenerational transfers for U.S. savings. Modigliani's paper is the latest salvo in a long running debate over the importance of intergenerational transfers in explaining savings behavior. While Modigliani corrects an algebraic error of minor consequences in our earlier paper, its correction does not, in our view, call into question the fundamental conclusion that life cycle considerations can account for only a small part of aggregate capital accumulation. Inevitably, it is possible to challenge aspects of any complex empirical calculation. Modigliani's attacks seem to us incorrect in most cases and generally fail to address our primary method of determining the importance of intergenerational transfers. Many considerations at least as important as those raised by Modigilani suggest that our method produces an overestimate of the importance of life cycle wealth.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Asset Holdings and the Life Cycle
By Mervyn King and Louis Dicks-mireaux
-
Asset Accumulation, Information, and the Life Cycle
By Mervyn King and Jonathan I. Leape
-
Saving, Growth, and Aging in Taiwan
By Angus Deaton and Christina H. Paxson
-
Household Portfolios in the Netherlands
By Rob Alessie, Stefan Hochguertel, ...
-
Dissaving after Retirement: Testing the Pure Life Cycle Hypothesis
-
Pension Wealth and Household Savings: Tests of Robustness
By Louis Dicks-mireaux and Mervyn King
-
Social Security, Bequests, and the Life Cycle Theory of Saving: Cross-Sectional Tests
By Alan S. Blinder, Roger H. Gordon, ...
-
Capital Accumulation and Annuities in an Adverse Selection Economy
By Martin Eichenbaum and Dan Peled