Life-Cycle Consumption, Asset Allocation, and Pension Design Under Non-Standard Preferences

39 Pages Posted: 5 Nov 2014

See all articles by Stefan Zimmermann

Stefan Zimmermann

University of Vienna - Faculty of Business, Economics, and Statistics

Date Written: July 1, 2014

Abstract

This paper uses a behavioral life-cycle model to analyze different pension schemes when people display non-standard consumption preferences and income-heterogeneity. Retirement resources depend on public pension benefits and individual savings accumulated over working life. Individual savings crucially depend on the choice between low-risk and high-risk assets, because there is a sizable return gap. Mainstream economic models do not adequately capture peoples’ life-cycle asset allocation patterns, that is, their investment in safe and risky assets. The proposed model makes a better prediction. I investigate whether a transition towards a funded pension scheme is desirable, and whether different income classes could benefit from different pension schemes. The rationale is that a non-funded pension component provides better downward risk protection for the low-income earners, whereas a funded pension component is more appealing to rent-seeking, high-income earners. Simulation results reveal that a funded pension scheme is most promising for all income classes — considering reasonable demographic and financial market projections for Germany.

Keywords: D11, D61, D81, D91, E21, E27, H31, J26

JEL Classification: Behavioral Decision-Making, Consumer Choice, Pension Design, Asset Allocation

Suggested Citation

Zimmermann, Stefan, Life-Cycle Consumption, Asset Allocation, and Pension Design Under Non-Standard Preferences (July 1, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2519132 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2519132

Stefan Zimmermann (Contact Author)

University of Vienna - Faculty of Business, Economics, and Statistics ( email )

Vienna, A-1090
Austria

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
104
Abstract Views
952
Rank
554,848
PlumX Metrics