Click'N'Roll: No Evidence of Illusion of Control

17 Pages Posted: 11 May 2015 Last revised: 9 May 2025

See all articles by Antonio Filippin

Antonio Filippin

Università degli Studi di Milano; IZA Institute of Labor Economics

Paolo Crosetto

Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory

Abstract

Evidence of Illusion of Control – the fact that people believe to have control over pure chance events – is a recurrent finding in experimental psychology. Results in economics find instead little to no support. In this paper we test whether this dissonant result across disciplines is due to the fact that economists have implemented only one form of illusory control. We identify and separately tests in an incentive-compatible design two types of control: a) over the resolution of uncertainty, as usually done in the economics literature, and b) over the choice of the lottery, as sometimes done in the psychology literature but without monetary payoffs. Results show no evidence of illusion of control, neither on choices nor on beliefs about the likelihood of winning, thus supporting the hypotheses that incentives crowd out illusion of control.

Keywords: Illusion of Control, experiment, risk elicitation, hypothetical bias

JEL Classification: B49, C91, D81

Suggested Citation

Filippin, Antonio and Crosetto, Paolo, Click'N'Roll: No Evidence of Illusion of Control. IZA Discussion Paper No. 9030, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2604393

Antonio Filippin (Contact Author)

Università degli Studi di Milano ( email )

Milan, 20122
Italy

IZA Institute of Labor Economics

P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

Paolo Crosetto

Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory ( email )

BP 47
38040 Grenoble
France

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
76
Abstract Views
763
Rank
694,227
PlumX Metrics