The Right to Information from the Procedural Standpoint (Judicial and Non-Judicial)

A&C – Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional, Belo Horizonte, ano 15, n. 61, p. 43-50, jul./set. 2015

8 Pages Posted: 17 May 2015 Last revised: 19 Oct 2015

See all articles by Ricardo Perlingeiro

Ricardo Perlingeiro

Fluminense Federal University - Faculty of Law; Birmingham City University - Faculty of Business, Law and Social Sciences

Date Written: May 16, 2015

Abstract

A versão em português deste texto está disponível em: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2607021. 本文中文版请见: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2592361.

The author takes a general descriptive approach to the system of jurisdictional review of decisions concerning access to official information in Latin America, with the aim of enabling a future comparative administrative law study on information access in the People’s Republic of China. The first two topics are related to an overview of the right to information access in Latin America and the corresponding laws, with imprecise rules that lead to behavior by the administrative authorities that is subject to review of dubious effectiveness, so that the authorities are verging on a state of immunity incompatible with the Rule of Law. The third part is about the developments in Latin America up to the present day, jurisdictional review (judicial and non-judicial) of administrative decisions not only in terms of their formal legality but, above all, their substantive legality, i.e., a review of the content of the administrative decisions, including the discretionary administrative powers and margin of administrative appreciation. The fourth topic, the due process clause, influenced by the USA, is discussed in the context of Latin American information access law, in comparison with the Continental European tradition of administrative law. The fifth and final point concerns the models of jurisdictional review of decisions on information access within the sphere of the OAS (Organization of American States) and Latin American countries. Among other conclusions, the author states that the search for an effective information access system that does not necessarily depend on opting for a model already established in Brazil, Latin America, the USA or Europe; what is of fundamental importance is to provide the interested parties with access to a fair trial guaranteeing their right to information access except in cases in which secrecy is necessary and justified according to the international human rights criteria. Contents: 1) Latin American overview of the right to information access; 2) Vague legal concept and vulnerability of information access law; 3) Jurisdictional review (judicial and non-judicial) of the margin of administrative appreciation; 4) Administrative due process of law in Latin America; 5) Models of review of decisions on information access within the sphere of the OAS and Latin American countries.

Keywords: Right to information access, administrative jurisdiction, due process of law, Latin America

JEL Classification: K11, K13, K14, K23, N40

Suggested Citation

Perlingeiro, Ricardo, The Right to Information from the Procedural Standpoint (Judicial and Non-Judicial) (May 16, 2015). A&C – Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional, Belo Horizonte, ano 15, n. 61, p. 43-50, jul./set. 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2607023

Ricardo Perlingeiro (Contact Author)

Fluminense Federal University - Faculty of Law ( email )

Rua Presidente Pedreira, 62
Niterói, 24210-470
Brazil

Birmingham City University - Faculty of Business, Law and Social Sciences ( email )

4 Cardigan Street
Birmingham, B4 7BD
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
66
Abstract Views
640
Rank
749,441
PlumX Metrics