Competitive Quality Choice and Remanufacturing

Production and Operations Management, Vol. 23, No. 1, January 2014

Posted: 5 Jul 2015

See all articles by Adem Orsdemir

Adem Orsdemir

University of California, Riverside (UCR) - UCR School of Business Administration (SoBA)

Eda Kemahlioglu Ziya

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Operations Area

Ali K. Parlakturk

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Operations Area

Date Written: July 4, 2015

Abstract

We consider an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) who faces competition from an independent remanufacturer(IR). The OEM decides the quality of the new product, which also determines the quality of the competing remanufactured product. The OEM and the IR then competitively determine their production quantities. We explicitly characterize how the OEM competes with the IR in equilibrium. Specifically, we show that the OEM relies more on quality as a strategic lever when it has a stronger competitive position (determined by the relative cost and value of new and remanufactured products), and in contrast it relies more heavily on limiting quantity of cores when it has a weaker competitive position. The IR’s entry threat as well as its successful entry can decrease the consumer surplus. Furthermore, our results illustrate that ignoring the competition or the OEM’s quality choice leads to overestimating benefits of remanufacturing for consumer and social welfare. In addition, we show an IR with either a sufficiently weak competitive position (so the OEM deters entry) or a sufficiently strong one (so the OEM is forced to limit quantity of cores) is desirable for reducing the environmental impact. Comparing our results with the benchmark in which the OEM remanufactures suggests that encouraging IRs to remanufacture in lieu of the OEMs may not benefit the environment. Furthermore, the benchmark illustrates that making remanufacturing more attractive improves the environmental impact when the remanufacturer is the OEM, while worsening it when remanufacturing is done by the IR.

Keywords: product quality; remanufacturing; competition; environmental impact; social welfare

Suggested Citation

Orsdemir, Adem and Kemahlioglu Ziya, Eda and Parlakturk, Ali K., Competitive Quality Choice and Remanufacturing (July 4, 2015). Production and Operations Management, Vol. 23, No. 1, January 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2626667

Adem Orsdemir (Contact Author)

University of California, Riverside (UCR) - UCR School of Business Administration (SoBA) ( email )

900 University Ave.
Anderson Hall
Riverside, CA 92521
United States

Eda Kemahlioglu Ziya

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Operations Area ( email )

300 Kenan Center Drive
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
United States

Ali K. Parlakturk

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Operations Area ( email )

300 Kenan Center Drive
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
United States
(919) 962-3181 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,175
PlumX Metrics