Exhuming Q: Market Power vs. Capital Market Imperfections
22 Pages Posted: 24 Mar 2001 Last revised: 11 Nov 2022
Date Written: March 2001
Abstract
Evidence of the statistical significance of profits in Q regressions remains one of the principal findings in the empirical investment literature. This result is frequently taken to support the view that capital market imperfections are an important element for understanding investment. This paper challenges that conclusion. We argue that allowing the profit function at the firm level to be strictly concave, reflecting, for example, market power, is sucent to replicate the Q theory based regression results in which profits are a significant factor determining investment. To be clear, our ability to replicate the existing results does not require the specification of any capital market imperfections. Thus the friction that explains the statistical significance of profits could be market power by sellers rather than capital market imperfections.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
By Russell Cooper and John Haltiwanger
-
Machine Replacement and the Business Cycle: Lumps and Bumps
By Russell Cooper, John Haltiwanger, ...
-
Putty-Clay and Investment: A Business Cycle Analysis
By Simon Gilchrist and John C. Williams
-
Putty-Clay and Investment: a Business Cycle Analysis
By Simon Gilchrist and John C. Williams
-
Estimating Adjustment Costs with Data on Heterogeneous Capital Goods
By Austan Goolsbee and David B. Gross
-
The Mix and Scale of Factors with Irreversibility and Fixed Costs of Investment
By Andrew B. Abel and Janice C. Eberly