Why Cities Should Not Be Subsidized
19 Pages Posted: 8 Sep 2001
Date Written: August 2001
Abstract
The paper deals with the question of whether fiscal transfers received by cities can be justified by a higher cost of producing publicly provided goods. In the model, increasing the population density implies both a higher output per capita due to agglomeration economies and a higher cost of the publicly provided good due to congestion. It is shown that introducing fiscal transfers to be paid by the region with the lower population density will generally reduce welfare. This result is obtained since the city is already beyond the level of optimum agglomeration. Provided Goods
Keywords: Interjurisdictional Transfers, Congestion, Publicly
JEL Classification: D62, H40, H73, H77
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Should Suburbs Help Their Central City?
By Andrew Haughwout and Robert P. Inman
-
Fiscal Policies in Open Cities with Firms and Households
By Andrew Haughwout and Robert P. Inman
-
Local Revenue Hills: Evidence from Four U.S. Cities
By Andrew Haughwout, Robert P. Inman, ...
-
Local Revenue Hills: Evidence from Four U.S. Cities
By Andrew Haughwout, Robert P. Inman, ...
-
By Gebhard Kirchgässner and Lars P. Feld
-
How Should Suburbs Help Their Central Cities?
By Andrew Haughwout and Robert P. Inman
-
Local Revenue Hills: A General Equilibrium Specification with Evidence from Four U.S. Cities
By Andrew Haughwout, Robert P. Inman, ...