Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2912344
 


 



Fairness, Equality, Proportionality, and Parsimony: Towards a Comprehensive Jurisprudence of Just Punishment


Michael Tonry


University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law

January 29, 2017

Penal Censure (Anthony E. Bottoms & Antje Bois-Pedain, eds., Oxford: Hart, Forthcoming)
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-04

Abstract:     
The retributive conception of punishment as a process for censuring blameworthy conduct is an important component of a complete theory of punitive justice, but by itself is not enough. Nor are ‘mixed’ theories that incorporate traditional retributive ideas as constraints on pursuit of consequentialist crime prevention goals. If punishment were unidimensional, involved only first offenders convicted of a single offence, and based solely on censuring blameworthy behaviour, theorizing would be easier: offenders should be censured, and punished, precisely as much as they deserve relative to the censure and punishment of others convicted of the same and different offences. In mixed theories, punishments of individuals should never exceed what is deserved relative to the punishments of others. All that would be needed is a sufficiently discriminant ordinal scale of offence seriousness tied to proportionate punishments. Theories of punitive justice, however, cannot be unidimensional. Nor can they be premised on the situations of first offenders, on single offences, or on a single overriding value such as censure. More is at stake. A complete theory of punitive justice must also satisfy the requirements of independently important principles of fairness, equal treatment, and human dignity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: Censure, Retributivism, Monist Theories, Multiple Offense Paradox


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 7, 2017  

Suggested Citation

Tonry, Michael, Fairness, Equality, Proportionality, and Parsimony: Towards a Comprehensive Jurisprudence of Just Punishment (January 29, 2017). Penal Censure (Anthony E. Bottoms & Antje Bois-Pedain, eds., Oxford: Hart, Forthcoming); Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-04. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2912344

Contact Information

Michael Tonry (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law ( email )
229-19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 128
Downloads: 54
Download Rank: 309,575