The wide variety of dissemination and implementation designs now being used to evaluate and improve health systems and outcomes warrants review of the scope, features, and limitations of these designs. This article is one product of a design workgroup that was formed in 2013 by the National Institutes of Health to address dissemination and implementation research, and whose members represented diverse methodologic backgrounds, content focus areas, and health sectors. These experts integrated their collective knowledge on dissemination and implementation designs with searches of published evaluations strategies. This article emphasizes randomized and nonrandomized designs for the traditional translational research continuum or pipeline, which builds on existing efficacy and effectiveness trials to examine how one or more evidence-based clinical/prevention interventions are adopted, scaled up, and sustained in community or service delivery systems. We also mention other designs, including hybrid designs that combine effectiveness and implementation research, quality improvement designs for local knowledge, and designs that use simulation modeling.
Brown, C. Hendricks and Curran, Geoffrey and Palinkas, Lawrence A. and Aarons, Gregory A. and Wells, Kenneth B. and Jones, Loretta and Collins, Linda and Duan, Naihua and Mittman, Brian and Wallace, Andrea and Tabak, Rachel and Ducharme, Lori and Chambers, David and Neta, Gila and Wiley, Tisha and Landsverk, John and Cheung, Ken and Cruden, Gracelyn, An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation (March 2017). Annual Review of Public Health, Vol. 38, pp. 1-22, 2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2953207 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215