Interrogation Parity

20 Pages Posted: 24 May 2018  

Kate Levine

St. John's University - School of Law

Stephen Rushin

Loyola University Chicago School of Law

Date Written: April 18, 2018

Abstract

Over the past several years, many have taken note of the special interrogation protections afforded to the police when they become the target of internal or criminal investigation. There is also widespread agreement that existing interrogation protections for ordinary criminal suspects are not strong enough.

In this symposium essay, we propose a novel method by which the federal government could combat this sort of distributional inequality in the criminal justice system, while promoting broader reform in police interrogation procedures. We propose that Congress use its spending power to condition federal funds to police departments on the adoption of uniform, minimum protections for both police and civilian suspects facing interrogations.

Admittedly, Congress has rarely conditioned federal grants to police departments on the protection of individual rights. Nevertheless, we argue that such an approach is normatively desirable and constitutionally permissible.

Keywords: interrogations, policing, police misconduct, police reform

JEL Classification: K1, K10, K14

Suggested Citation

Levine, Kate and Rushin, Stephen, Interrogation Parity (April 18, 2018). University of Illinois Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3164926

Kate Levine

St. John's University - School of Law ( email )

8000 Utopia Parkway
Jamaica, NY 11439
United States
7189906018 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.stjohns.edu/academics/bio/kate-levine-0

Stephen Rushin (Contact Author)

Loyola University Chicago School of Law ( email )

25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
45
Abstract Views
268
PlumX