Labor Market Effects of U.S. Sick Pay Mandates

70 Pages Posted: 20 Oct 2018 Last revised: 16 Feb 2021

See all articles by Stefan Pichler

Stefan Pichler

University of Groningen - Faculty of Economics and Business

Nicolas R. Ziebarth

Cornell University

Date Written: September 21, 2018

Abstract

This paper exploits temporal and spatial variation in the implementation of nine-city- and four state-level U.S. sick pay mandates to assess their labor market consequences. We use the synthetic control group method and traditional difference-in-differences models along with the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages to estimate the causal effects of mandated sick pay on employment and wages. We do not find much evidence that employment or wages were significantly affected by the mandates that typically allow employees to earn one hour of paid sick leave per work week, up to seven days per year. Employment decreases of 2 percent lie outside the 92 percent confidence interval and wage decreases of 3 percent lie outside the 95 percent confidence interval.

Keywords: sick pay mandates, sick leave, medical leave, employer mandates, employment, wages, synthetic control group method (SCGM), Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), United States (U.S.)

JEL Classification: I12, I13, I18, J22, J28, J32

Suggested Citation

Pichler, Stefan and Ziebarth, Nicolas R., Labor Market Effects of U.S. Sick Pay Mandates (September 21, 2018). Journal of Human Resources, Spring 2020 vol. 55 no. 2 611-659, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3256447

Stefan Pichler

University of Groningen - Faculty of Economics and Business ( email )

Postbus 72
9700 AB Groningen
Netherlands

Nicolas R. Ziebarth (Contact Author)

Cornell University ( email )

Ithaca, NY
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.human.cornell.edu/bio.cfm?netid=nrz2

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
91
Abstract Views
547
Rank
618,340
PlumX Metrics