Civil Rights Law in Living Color

76 Pages Posted: 8 Apr 2019

See all articles by Vinay Harpalani

Vinay Harpalani

Savannah Law School; Drake University Law School

Date Written: March 16, 2019

Abstract

This Article examines how American civil rights law has treated “color” discrimination and differentiated it from race discrimination. It is the first scholarly work to analyze the changing legal meaning of “color” discrimination throughout American history. The Article covers views of “color” in the antebellum era; Reconstruction laws; early equal protection cases; the U.S. Census; modern civil rights statutes; and in People v. Bridgeforth, a landmark 2016 ruling by the New York Court of Appeals. First, the Article lays out the complex relationship between race and color and discusses the phenomenon of colorism—oppression based on skin color—as differentiated from racism. From a historical perspective, the Article then analyzes “color” in Reconstruction Era anti-discrimination laws, examining why both “race” and “color” were included in these laws. It illustrates that under early equal protection cases, prohibitions on “race” and “color” discrimination both aimed to curb racism. “Race” and “color” were equally important, but under the Fourteenth Amendment, “color” never developed any meaning independent of race. The Article shows how “color” disappeared from equal protection jurisprudence, just as civil rights efforts started to become successful. It discusses how modern civil rights statutes define “color” discrimination differently, focusing on colorism rather than racism. Additionally, color discrimination claims under these statutes have only applied to an individual member of one racial subclass, such as a dark-skinned Black plaintiff. However, in Bridgeforth, the Court of Appeals recognized a multiracial color class, composed of a group of dark-skinned individuals of different races, for equal protection-based Batson challenges to juror exclusion. Bridgeforth was the first case to allow Batson challenges for color discrimination, and the first color discrimination case under any law to recognize a multiracial color class. This Article considers the potential of multiracial color classes for the future of civil rights law.

Keywords: race, color, civil rights

Suggested Citation

Harpalani, Vinay, Civil Rights Law in Living Color (March 16, 2019). Maryland Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3353662

Vinay Harpalani (Contact Author)

Savannah Law School ( email )

United States
2158734476 (Phone)

Drake University Law School ( email )

2507 University Avenue
Des Moines, IA 50311
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
35
Abstract Views
259
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information