header

Direct Comparison of Angiogenesis in Natural and Synthetic Biomaterials Reveals Matrix Porosity Regulates Endothelial Cell Invasion Speed and Sprout Diameter

42 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2021 Publication Status: Published

See all articles by William Wang

William Wang

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Biomedical Engineering

Robert N. Kent III

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Stephanie A. Huang

Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Evan H. Jarman

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Eve H. Shikanov

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Christopher D. Davidson

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Harrison L. Hiraki

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Biomedical Engineering

Daphne Lin

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Monica A. Wall

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Jae-Won Shin

University of Illinois at Chicago

William Polacheck

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering

Ariella Shikanov

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Biomedical Engineering

Brendon M. Baker

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Vascularization of large, diffusion-hindered biomaterial implants requires an understanding of how extracellular matrix (ECM) properties regulate angiogenesis. Sundry biomaterials assessed across many disparate angiogenesis assays have highlighted ECM determinants that influence this complex multicellular process.  However, the abundance of material platforms, each with unique parameters to model endothelial cell (EC) sprouting presents additional challenges of interpretation and comparison between studies. In this work we directly compared the angiogenic potential of commonly utilized natural (collagen and fibrin) and synthetic dextran vinyl sulfone (DexVS) hydrogels in a multiplexed angiogenesis-on-a-chip platform. Modulating matrix density of collagen and fibrin hydrogels confirmed prior findings that increases in matrix density correspond to increased EC invasion as connected, multicellular sprouts, but with decreased invasion speeds. Angiogenesis in synthetic DexVS hydrogels, however, resulted in fewer multicellular sprouts. Characterizing hydrogel Young’s modulus and permeability (a measure of matrix porosity), we identified matrix permeability to significantly correlate with EC invasion depth and sprout diameter. Although microporous collagen and fibrin hydrogels produced lumenized sprouts in vitro, they rapidly resorbed post-implantation into the murine epididymal fat pad. In contrast, DexVS hydrogels proved comparatively stable. To enhance angiogenesis within DexVS hydrogels, we incorporated sacrificial microgels to generate cell-scale pores throughout the hydrogel. Microporous DexVS hydrogels resulted in lumenized sprouts in vitro and enhanced cell invasion in vivo . Towards the design of vascularized biomaterials for long-term regenerative therapies, this work suggests that synthetic biomaterials offer improved size and shape control following implantation and that tuning matrix porosity may better support host angiogenesis.

Keywords: Angiogenesis, Cell Migration, Cell Proliferation, Microfluidics, ECM, Endothelial Cells, Chemotaxis, Hydrogels, Microvasculature, Sprouting Morphogenesis, Matrix porosity

Suggested Citation

Wang, William and Kent III, Robert N. and Huang, Stephanie A. and Jarman, Evan H. and Shikanov, Eve H. and Davidson, Christopher D. and Hiraki, Harrison L. and Lin, Daphne and Wall, Monica A. and Shin, Jae-Won and Polacheck, William and Shikanov, Ariella and Baker, Brendon M., Direct Comparison of Angiogenesis in Natural and Synthetic Biomaterials Reveals Matrix Porosity Regulates Endothelial Cell Invasion Speed and Sprout Diameter. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3793926 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3793926

William Wang

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Biomedical Engineering ( email )

500 S. State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States

Robert N. Kent III

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Stephanie A. Huang

Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ( email )

102 Ridge Road
Chapel Hill, NC NC 27514
United States

Evan H. Jarman

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Eve H. Shikanov

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Christopher D. Davidson

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Harrison L. Hiraki

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Biomedical Engineering ( email )

500 S. State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States

Daphne Lin

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Monica A. Wall

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Jae-Won Shin

University of Illinois at Chicago

William Polacheck

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering ( email )

1840 Entrepreneur Drive
Raleigh, NC 27695
United States

Ariella Shikanov

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Biomedical Engineering ( email )

500 S. State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States

Brendon M. Baker (Contact Author)

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Biomedical Engineering ( email )

500 S. State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
94
Abstract Views
542
PlumX Metrics