Citations (12)


Footnotes (175)



Romantic Authorship and the Rhetoric of Property

Mark A. Lemley

Stanford Law School

Texas Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 873, 1997

This is a review of James Boyle's new book, Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Boyle's book ranges across the law of information, which he argues should be treated as a unified discipline. Boyle applies his analysis of "romantic authorship" to the law of information, arguing that in copyright and elsewhere, the law gives new works too much protection because it wrongly discounts the sources on which those works necessarily build. In this review, I suggest that whatever its merits as legal argument, "romantic authorship" does not explain very much about the features of copyright law, nor why copyright protection is expanding over time. I suggest an alternative explanation: that a particular strand of law and economics scholarship that endorses strong property rights is pushing for the "propertization" of all valuable information.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 30, 1997 ; Last revised: May 14, 2014

Suggested Citation

Lemley, Mark A., Romantic Authorship and the Rhetoric of Property. Texas Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 873, 1997. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=44418 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.44418

Contact Information

Mark A. Lemley (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 7,905
Downloads: 1,012
Download Rank: 15,892
Citations:  12
Footnotes:  175