Cryptocurrencies, Nfts, And The Expanding Definition Of "Investment Contract": Has The S.E.C. Already Torpedoed The Howey Test?

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, Vol. XXX, Issue 2 (forthcoming summer 2025)

U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 24-055

82 Pages Posted: 21 Apr 2025 Last revised: 28 May 2025

See all articles by David Guenther

David Guenther

University of Michigan Law School

Date Written: February 28, 2025

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court in S.E.C. v. W.J. Howey Co. in 1946 famously defined the term "investment contract"-the catch-all term in the definition of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933-to mean (i) an investment of money, (ii) in a common enterprise, (iii) with an expectation of profits solely from the efforts of others. While the Howey test has endured as the standard definition of an investment contract, the Howey Court did not define the term "common enterprise," and for more than fifty years, Howey's "common enterprise" prong has eroded. Since 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission has further eroded the Howey test. In the course of a broad enforcement initiative against issuers of cryptocurrencies and nonfungible tokens, the S.E.C. has systematically ignored Howey's "common enterprise" prong and declared that a "common enterprise" is not a "distinct element" of an investment contract. In a In a series of related cases, the Southern District of New York has largely accepted the S.E.C.’s position. By 2024, the S.E.C. and the Southern District appeared ready to find an “investment contract” wherever there was (i) an investment of money and (ii) investor profits depended on the promoter’s efforts. Howey’s “common enterprise” prong has been eliminated, and the decisive inquiry has become only Howey’s “profits from the efforts of others” prong. The Howey test – in part due to its own internal weaknesses – has collapsed back into its blue sky precedents. Has the S.E.C. already torpedoed the Howey test? I conclude that the answer is yes. Commentators and dissenting S.E.C. commissioners have questioned whether the S.E.C. has expanded Howey to apply to a range of commercial transactions beyond the reasonable scope of the federal securities laws. Public policy limits are needed on any “investment contract” test.

Keywords: Cryptocurrency, NFT, Investment Contract, Howey, S.E.C.

Suggested Citation

Guenther, David B., Cryptocurrencies, Nfts, And The Expanding Definition Of "Investment Contract": Has The S.E.C. Already Torpedoed The Howey Test? (February 28, 2025). Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, Vol. XXX, Issue 2 (forthcoming summer 2025), U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 24-055, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5206812 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5206812

David B. Guenther (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

3120 Jeffries Hall
701 S. State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
7347631895 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
73
Abstract Views
369
Rank
716,858
PlumX Metrics