Cryptocurrencies, Nfts, And The Expanding Definition Of "Investment Contract": Has The S.E.C. Already Torpedoed The Howey Test?
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, Vol. XXX, Issue 2 (forthcoming summer 2025)
82 Pages Posted: 21 Apr 2025 Last revised: 28 May 2025
Date Written: February 28, 2025
Abstract
The U.S. Supreme Court in S.E.C. v. W.J. Howey Co. in 1946 famously defined the term "investment contract"-the catch-all term in the definition of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933-to mean (i) an investment of money, (ii) in a common enterprise, (iii) with an expectation of profits solely from the efforts of others. While the Howey test has endured as the standard definition of an investment contract, the Howey Court did not define the term "common enterprise," and for more than fifty years, Howey's "common enterprise" prong has eroded. Since 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission has further eroded the Howey test. In the course of a broad enforcement initiative against issuers of cryptocurrencies and nonfungible tokens, the S.E.C. has systematically ignored Howey's "common enterprise" prong and declared that a "common enterprise" is not a "distinct element" of an investment contract. In a In a series of related cases, the Southern District of New York has largely accepted the S.E.C.’s position. By 2024, the S.E.C. and the Southern District appeared ready to find an “investment contract” wherever there was (i) an investment of money and (ii) investor profits depended on the promoter’s efforts. Howey’s “common enterprise” prong has been eliminated, and the decisive inquiry has become only Howey’s “profits from the efforts of others” prong. The Howey test – in part due to its own internal weaknesses – has collapsed back into its blue sky precedents. Has the S.E.C. already torpedoed the Howey test? I conclude that the answer is yes. Commentators and dissenting S.E.C. commissioners have questioned whether the S.E.C. has expanded Howey to apply to a range of commercial transactions beyond the reasonable scope of the federal securities laws. Public policy limits are needed on any “investment contract” test.
Keywords: Cryptocurrency, NFT, Investment Contract, Howey, S.E.C.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation