The Question of Generation Adequacy in Liberalised Electricity Markets

27 Pages Posted: 28 Oct 2004

See all articles by L.J. de Vries

L.J. de Vries

Delft University of Technology - Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management

R. A. Hakvoort

Delft University of Technology

Date Written: September 2004

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the reasons why unregulated markets for the production of electricity cannot be expected to invest sufficiently in generation capacity on a continuous basis. Although it can be shown that periodic price spikes should provide generation companies with sufficient investment incentives in theory, there are a number of probable causes of market failure. A likely result is the development of investment cycles that may affect the adequacy of capacity. The experience in California shows the great social costs associated with an episode of scarce generation capacity. Another disadvantage is that generation companies can manipulate price spikes. This would result in large transfers of income from consumers to producers and reduce the operational reliability of electricity supply during these price spikes. We end this paper by outlining several methods that have been proposed to stabilise the market, which provide better incentives to generation companies and consumers alike.

Keywords: Generation adequacy, Liberalised electricity market

JEL Classification: Q41, Q43

Suggested Citation

de Vries, Laurens J. and Hakvoort, R. A., The Question of Generation Adequacy in Liberalised Electricity Markets (September 2004). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=600503 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.600503

Laurens J. De Vries (Contact Author)

Delft University of Technology - Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management ( email )

P.O. Box 5015
2600 GB Delft
Netherlands

R. A. Hakvoort

Delft University of Technology ( email )

Stevinweg 1
Stevinweg 1
Delft, 2628 CN
Netherlands

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
489
Abstract Views
3,496
Rank
125,387
PlumX Metrics