Is Inequality in Africa Really Different?
44 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016
Date Written: November 18, 2003
Abstract
High inequality in Africa is something of a paradox: Africa should be a low-inequality continent according to the Kuznets hypothesis (because African countries are poor and agriculture-based), and also because land (the main asset) is widely shared. Milanovic's hypothesis is that African inequality is politically determined. Yet in the empirical analysis, despite the introduction of several political variables, there is still an inequality-increasing "Africa effect" linked to ethnic fractionalization. The politics, however, may work through ethnic fractionalization, which provides an easy and secure basis for the formation of political groups. Although this is a plausible explanation, it is not fully satisfactory, and the author criticizes it in the concluding section.
This paper - a product of the Poverty Team, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to study inequality in the world.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Explaining Inequality the World Round: Cohort Size, Kuznets Curves, and Openness
-
Explaining Inequality the World Round: Cohort Size, Kuznets Curves, Andopenness
-
Growth, Distribution and Demography: Some Lessons from History
-
Interactions between National and Regional Development
By Sara Davies and Martin Hallet
-
The Impact of Globalization on Pre-Industrial, Technologically Quiescent Economies
-
The Impact of Globalization on Pre-Industrial, Technologically Quiescent Economies
-
Equity, Welfare, and the Setting of Trade Policy in General Equilibrium