Liability-Creating Versus Non-Liability-Creating Fiscal Stabilization Policies: Ricardian Equivalence, Fiscal Stabilization, and Emu
29 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2006
There are 2 versions of this paper
Liability-Creating Versus Non-Liability-Creating Fiscal Stabilization Policies: Ricardian Equivalence, Fiscal Stabilization, and Emu
Liability-Creating Versus Non-Liability-Creating Fiscal Stabilization Policies: Ricardian Equivalence, Fiscal Stabilization and Emu
Date Written: August 1998
Abstract
This paper looks at theoretical and empirical issues associated with the operation of fiscal stabilizers within an economy. It argues that such stabilizers operate most effectively at a national, rather than local, level. As differing cycles across regions tend to offset each other for the country as a whole, national fiscal stabilizers are not associated with the same increase in future tax liabilities for the region as local ones. Accordingly, the negative impact from the Ricardian effects associated with these tax liabilities is smaller. Empirical work on data across Canadian provinces indicates that local stabilizers are only 1/3 to ½ as effective as national stabilizers that create no future tax liability.
Keywords: Fiscal Stabilization, Levels of Government, Ricardian Equivalence
JEL Classification: E63, H31, H77
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Fiscal Federalism and Optimum Currency Areas: Evidence for Europe from the United States
-
Regional Nonadjustment and Fiscal Policy: Lessons for Emu
By Maurice Obstfeld and Giovanni Peri
-
Regional Risksharing and Redistribution in the German Federation
By Ralf Hepp and Jürgen Von Hagen
-
Regional Income Redistribution and Risk Sharing How Does Italy Compare in Europe?
-
Monetary Policy in an Emerging European Economic and Monetary Union: Key Issues
-
How Many Monies? A Genetic Approach to Finding Optimum Currency Areas
By Atish R. Ghosh and Holger C. Wolf