Does Aid Work? New Evidence from Recent Empirical Studies
29 Pages Posted: 31 Mar 2006
Date Written: May 2004
Abstract
The main message of the Assessing Aid report of the World Bank (1998) is that aid is effective in stimulating economic growth, but only when the government policies of the recipient country are good. Donor countries have picked up this message and have used it to become more selective when making countries eligible for aid. We review the empirical literature that has contested the main conclusions of the report. According to our review, the critics convincingly show that the conclusions are based on fragile econometric evidence. Moreover, they criticise the measurement of good policy by the World Bank. The critics also come up with alternative explanations of the effectiveness of aid, such decreasing returns of aid and the importance of geographical or climate-related circumstances. Based on our review, we conclude that donors that have based their policies on the results of the Assessing Aid report should reconsider their policies of aid selectivity and use other criteria than good policy.
Keywords: development aid, effectiveness, economic growth
JEL Classification: F35, O40
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By A. Craig Burnside and David Dollar
-
Aid, Policies, and Growth: Revisiting the Evidence
By A. Craig Burnside and David Dollar
-
Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?
By Alberto F. Alesina and David Dollar
-
Aid Allocation and Poverty Reduction
By David Dollar and Paul Collier
-
Aid and Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really Show?
-
Aid and Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really Show?
-
New Data, New Doubts: Revisiting 'Aid, Policies, and Growth'
By William Easterly, Ross Levine, ...
-
New Data, New Doubts: A Comment on Burnside and Dollar's "Aid, Policies, and Growth" (2000)
By William Easterly, Ross Levine, ...