The Limits of Strategic Litigation

7 Pages Posted: 29 Mar 2007 Last revised: 10 May 2009

Abstract

The model of marriage equality litigation that has dominated discussion to date is the carefully planned public interest lawsuit. In this model, gay rights organizations try to figure out which courts are most likely to be receptive to their claims, then recruit plaintiffs to challenge the laws on the books, and file suit.

There is, however, another model that will be increasingly relevant. That is the situation in which parties who had no interest whatever in being public interest plaintiffs find themselves unexpectedly trapped in an evil legal system that threatens to treat them in a viciously arbitrary and unfair way.

The next major wave of marriage equality litigation will involve substantive issues of choice of law. The most powerful choice of law claims will be those involving unfair surprise. And they can't be planned for.

Suggested Citation

Koppelman, Andrew M., The Limits of Strategic Litigation. Law & Sexuality, Forthcoming; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 07-09. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=976917

Andrew M. Koppelman (Contact Author)

Northwestern University School of Law ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-8431 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
180
rank
164,269
Abstract Views
1,152
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information