An Exploration of the Offset Hypothesis Using Disaggregate Data: the Case of Airbags and Antilock Brakes
20 Pages Posted: 14 Apr 2007
Date Written: May 2006
Abstract
The offset hypothesis predicts consumers adapt to innovations that improve safety by becoming less vigilant about safety. Previous tests have used aggregate data that may confound the effect of a safety policy with those consumers who are most affected by it. We test the hypothesis using disaggregate data to analyze the effects of airbags and antilock brakes on automobile safety. We find that safety-conscious drivers are more likely than other drivers to acquire airbags and antilock brakes but these safety devices do not have a significant effect on collisions or injuries, suggesting drivers trade off enhanced safety for speedier trips.
Keywords: safety, offset hypothesis
JEL Classification: H00
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Effects of Mandatory Seat Belt Laws on Driving Behavior and Traffic Fatalities
By Alma Cohen and Liran Einav
-
Sample Selection in the Estimation of Air Bag and Seat Belt Effectiveness
By Steven D. Levitt and Jack Porter
-
Estimating the Effect of Alcohol on Driver Risk Using Only Fatal Accident Statistics
By Steven D. Levitt and Jack Porter
-
Shifting Death to Their Alternatives: The Case of Toll Motorways
-
The Effect of Sunday Sales of Alcohol on Highway Crash Fatalities
By Mark Stehr
-
Antiretroviral Therapy Awareness and Risky Sexual Behaviors: Evidence from Mozambique
By Damien De Walque, Harounan Kazianga, ...