White Knights and Black Knights - Does the Search for Competitive Bids Always Benefit the Shareholders of 'Target' Companies?
18 Pages Posted: 23 Apr 2007 Last revised: 21 Mar 2008
There are 2 versions of this paper
White Knights and Black Knights: Does the Search for Competitive Bids Always Benefit the Shareholders of 'Target' Companies?
White Knights and Black Knights - Does the Search for Competitive Bids Always Benefit the Shareholders of 'Target' Companies?
Abstract
According to the EC Directive on Takeover Bids, defensive measures should be authorised by the general meeting of the target company. The incumbent board can, nonetheless, search for a competing bid, a so-called white knight. The rationale underpinning this exception is that competing bids always benefit target's shareholders. In this paper I will tackle this rationale, arguing that even competing bids could generate a pressure to tender on target's shareholders and, therefore, in this case should not be considered as a benefit for them.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Back to the Future? Bigshop 2 and Defensive Tactics in Takeovers
-
Legal Aspects of the Breakthrough Rule of the European Takeover Bid Directive
-
Issuer Choice in the EU and its Impact on the Market for Corporate Law
By Luca Enriques and Tobias H. Troeger
-
A Simple Theory of Takeover Regulation in the United States and Europe
-
By Han-wei Liu
-
Takeovers, Poison Pills and Protectionism in Comparative Corporate Governance
-
Is the Board Neutrality Rule Trivial? Amnesia About Corporate Law in European Takeover Regulation
By Carsten Gerner-beuerle, David Kershaw, ...