Reported Income in the Nlsy: Consistency Checks and Methods for Cleaningthe Data
29 Pages Posted: 24 Jul 2000 Last revised: 11 Jun 2023
Date Written: July 1994
Abstract
The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth collects information about over 20 separate components of respondent income. These disaggregated income components provide many opportunities to verify the consistency of the data. This note outlines procedures we have used to identify and `clean' measurement error in the disaggregated income variables. After cleanin the income data at the disaggregated level, we reconstruct the measure of 'family income' and re-evaluate poverty status. While people may not agree with all of our methods, we hope that they will be of some use to other researchers. A second purpose of this note is to highlight the value of the disaggregated data, since without it, it would be impossible to improve on the reported totals. Finally, we hope that with the advent of computerized interviewing technology, checks on the internal consistency of the data of the kind that we propose may eventually be built into interviewing software, thereby improving the quality of the data collected.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Extent of Measurement Error in Longitudinal Earnings Data: Do Two Wrongs Make a Right?
By John Bound and Alan B. Krueger
-
Intertemporal Labor Supply and Long Term Employment Contracts
By John M. Abowd and David Card
-
Macroeconomic Analysis and Microeconomic Analyses of Labor Supply
-
Generating Equality and Eliminating Poverty, the Swedish Way
-
Are Earnings Inequality and Mobility Overstated? The Impact of Non-Classical Measurement Error
By Peter Gottschalk and Minh Huynh
-
Explaining the Recent Divergence in Payroll and Household Employment Growth
By Chinhui Juhn and Simon Potter
-
Measurement Error and Misclassification: A Comparison of Survey and Register Data
By Arie Kapteyn and Jelmer Ypma